Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Beatles 4, Helter Skelter Part 2

Welcome to Part 4 of the Beatles devotional series.  Last time we talked about the emotional roller coaster of Grace using the lyrics of “Helter Skelter” as our backdrop.  While we’re talking about “Helter Skelter”, not only did I look at the lyrics and think about a topic, but I also looked at the story behind it and had a light bulb ding over my head.  The song was written as a reaction to the Who’s “I Can See For Miles.”  In a magazine interview, the Who’s guitarist, Pete Townshend, claimed it was “the loudest, rawest, dirtiest song the Who had ever recorded”.  So simply put:  Paul didn’t want to be outdone and set out to write his own “loudest, rawest, dirtiest song” – not just by the Beatles, but EVER.  And in the end, he went WAY farther in his outdoing than the original song had gone in its own doing.  Looking back, “I Can See For Miles” is relatively tame…especially judged by today’s standards, but even by 1967 standards, it’s not all that loud, or raw, or dirty.  The dirtiest part about that song is singing the chorus as a punchline while looking into someone’s ear.  I mean, when I told this story to my twelve year old one day when “I Can See For Miles” was on the radio, his response to me was “this is a rock song?”

Paul didn’t know all of that, though.  Paul wanted to be one that set the bar on the loudest, rawest, dirtiest standard.  During the recording sessions for the White Album, they recorded and re-recorded the song several times over.  One version running 12 minutes long, and the now-famous “I got blisters on my fingers!” outburst from Ringo came after the 18th take in one day and Ringo threw his drumsticks across the room and yelled (yeah, you got it) “I got blistuhs on muh finguhs!”  When it was released on the White Album, it was by far much louder, much more raw, and much dirtier than the puny little “I Can See For Miles”.  It was a nuclear missile in response to a cap gun with wet caps.

The up and down, mountaintops and valleys reference in the first “Helter Skelter” devotional were easy dots to connect.  This one requires a little more honesty with ourselves.  Paul didn’t want to be outdone.  He had never heard the other song, but he wanted to make sure that his response was more than adequate to be the bar setter.  Sometimes we hear rumors or whispers about us behind our back.  Sometimes they’re true and sometimes they’re not, but what we want to be sure of is that our response is more than adequate to outdo the rumor.  That wasn’t instruction, by the way:  that was observation.  Upon rereading I thought I should clarify.  We either explode into a fit of rage about the rumor or we reply with something ourselves.  It usually depends on whether we know the source or not, I suppose.  If it’s general hearsay rumblings, our exasperations and retaliations are probably a bit limited in where we can aim them.  It’s hard to get into a game of one-upsmanship with an unknown gossiper.  But if there’s a name attached to a rumor’s origin…oh boy, watch the fireworks!!  And the he said/she said volleys are even stronger serves when we talk about the younger generation and the age of social media.  Moment of honesty for most of us, though, our first thought (the first three words even) when someone does something like that is most likely, “I’ll show them!” and then we do.

I’m reminded of the episode of the Full House sitcom where Stephanie got into it with a girl named Gia over some boy.  Gia’s response was to tell everyone that Stephanie had paid the boy to go out with her.  Stephanie’s response to THAT was to get a friend to steal Gia’s school folder, and then they enlarged Gia’s horrendous report card to bulletin-board size and posted it on the wall.  It’s like a reminder of the Cold War and the fear of Massive Retaliation, as it was called.  Don’t launch that missile because of what might get sent back your way.  If the missile was launched from some unknown country, well then just raze the whole region to make sure you get the right one?  That’s the way we respond sometimes…we hear something about us, and it sounds like something that old so-and-so might have said, so lower the proverbial boom!  But what if wasn’t old so-and-so?  What you just bombed Canada when you should have bombed Greenland?  What if you just nuked Southeast Asia when you should have blasted the European Union?  (Not saying that your response should be that at all, just painting pictures)  But what if it’s worse?  What if you hear something attributed to “they said” and your retort is some earth-shattering rumor that you’ve heard about them?  But what if what “they said” wasn’t really what was reported to you?  What if you’ve just written a “Helter Skelter” in response to an “I Can See For Miles”?

But the message for both sides of the gossip fence is easy.  Listen for the Whisper that sounds like Proverbs 16:28.  A dishonest man spreads strife, and a whisperer separates close friends.  (that’s not a whisperer like “Listen for the…”)  If you don’t like that one, try Proverbs 6:16-19 on for size:  16 There are six things which the Lord hates,
Yes, seven which are an abomination to Him: 17 Haughty eyes, a lying tongue, And hands that shed innocent blood, 18 A heart that devises wicked plans, Feet that run rapidly to evil, 19 A false witness who utters lies, And one who spreads strife among brothers.
  Did you catch that?  How about we just lay it out there and roar it like a Lion?  Can we roar it like James 1:26?  26 If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless.  Wow, James just called your religion WORTHLESS if you can’t control your tongue!!  Oh, what’s that?  That’s just James, you say mockingly?  You want someone with actual scriptural authority, well let’s read some of the “red words” then…like the ones in Matthew 12:36: But I tell you that every careless word that people speak, they shall give an accounting for it in the Day of Judgment.  How about them apples?  Are you ready to give an accounting?  That goes for both sides of the fence.  Are you starting the gossip?  Are you repeating it?  Are counterattacking it?  It’s all the same.  An accounting for Every. Careless. Word.  Let that sink in.  Every. Careless. Word.

So if you hear something juicy and want to go tell your best buddy, pardon my French, but shut up!  If you decide that somebody is doing something you don’t like so you feel they need to be brought down a notch or two, shut it!  If someone comes to you and says, “old Bertha May just told me that you did/said whatever” then let it go.  Maybe go to Bertha May and kindly ask her why she’s saying it.  Maybe you can resolve a misunderstanding or maybe you can’t.  But whatever you do, don’t write a “Helter Skelter” in response an “I Can See For Miles.”  Or for that matter, don’t write a “Tiptoe Through The Tulips” or a “My Bonny Lies Over The Ocean” or a “Michael Row Your Boat Ashore” or a “Fishin’ Hole Andy Griffith Theme Song” either.  Whether it’s with Bertha May or whoever, at some point you’ll have to give an account for everything you’ve said.  And while this is strictly my opinion and not exactly scriptural, I’m pretty sure “well SHE started it!” won’t work any better on the Day of Judgment than it did with your mom.

So regardless of which side of the gossip fence you’re on…whether it’s the mudslinging side, or the pitching it back over the fence side…your first reaction shouldn’t be, “I’ll show them!”  The last thing you want to happen is to have a “Helter Skelter” overreaction to “I Can See For Miles”.  So instead of “I’ll show them,” remind yourself that the first three words we need to think of are “Every. Careless. Word.”

~Dwayne

No comments:

Post a Comment